Goals
|
Indicator Measures
|
How are we doing?
|
 |
10.1 Transportation that Enhances National and Global Competitiveness |
 |
10.1.1 Metro Boston’s global and national transportation capacity |
Boston’s air, sea and land connections contribute to its regional, national and local connectivity but are pressured by growth |
|
10.1.2 Household income spent on transportation: Boston vs. comparable regions |
In 1999-2000, transportation-related costs in Metro Boston accounted for 16.6% of total household expenditures |
|
|
|
10.2 An Integrated Regional System |
|
10.2.1 Distribution of daily trips, Boston and Metro Boston |
In 2002, despite a strong public transit system, about 77% of the 927,000 daily trips into Boston were by private cars |
|
10.2.2 Trends in rapid-transit ridership |
From 2000 to 2002, the subway system gained 20,000 new riders, who account for 668,000 new weekday trips. The T system is operating at 186.4% of its capacity at rush hours |
|
|
10.3 Equitable and High Quality Transportation Access for All |
|
10.3.1 Residents within a 10-minute walk or short drive from transit nodes by race, income, age group and transit dependencys |
56% of Boston residents, 79% of jobs and 51% of public schools are within a 10-minute walk, but low-income residents are underserved by walk-to rapid transit access |
|
10.3.2 Convenience of service to bus riders |
In 2001 the bus system was operating at 103% of capacity. Frequency of service was highest on routes through low-income communities followed by routes through communities of color |
|
10.3.3 Safety on streets and personal safety on public transit |
Massachusetts has only nine fatalities per 100,000 licensed drivers, less than half of the national average of 22. Crime on MBTA was unchanged |
|
|
|
